New York's gun law remains in effect as court gives more time for arguments
NEW YORK, Oct 12 (Reuters) - New York's new gun law will remain in effect for now after a federal appeals court on Wednesday agreed to temporarily reverse a lower court's order blocking the law's central provisions while a legal challenge by a gun-owners' rights group proceeds.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York City reversed the temporary restraining order issued last week by U.S. District Judge Glenn Suddaby while an appeal filed by New York's government was heard by a three-judge motions panel.
Last week's order had marked one of the most prominent victories by gun-owners' rights groups in challenging gun restrictions around the United States since June's landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that said for the first time that Americans have a constitutional right to carry weapons in public.
The Supreme Court ruling appalled New York's Democratic leaders, who were nonetheless obliged to overhaul the state's relatively restrictive gun-licensing regime after the court ruled it unconstitutional, alongside similar regimes in several other states.
The state's overhauled gun law took effect on Sept. 1 and is being closely watched by other states around a country in which gun violence has become recurrent. It establishes new requirements for obtaining a license, including submitting social media accounts for review, and creates a long list of public and private places where having a gun became a felony crime, even for license holders.
It is facing several legal challenges by gun owners, including the one before Suddaby at the District Court in Syracuse brought by six members of the advocacy group Gun Owners of America, which competes with the National Rifle Association for political influence.
Suddaby's order temporarily blocked the state from enforcing many of the new licensing provisions and drastically shortened its list of "sensitive locations" where having a gun, even with a license, is a new felony crime.
The appeals court's three-judge panel will later rule on whether to restore Suddaby's temporary restraining order. Suddaby, meanwhile, will hear arguments later this month on whether to grant a preliminary injunction that will again block central provisions of the new law while the litigation proceeds.
