Advertisement
Army catches snake found on street in Male’: Illegal import of livestock

Importers to bear costs for Illegal livestock repatriation

The amendment, introduced to the Regulation on the Removal and Disposal of Traded Goods and Possessions, was officially enacted yesterday.

8 October 2024

In a change to existing regulations, the Maldives government has amended its rules to ensure that the cost of repatriating or destroying illegally imported livestock will now be borne by the individuals responsible for bringing the animals into the country.

This development comes as part of the government's ongoing efforts to strengthen its commitment to wildlife protection and the control of illegal trade under the International Trade Control in Endangered Species Act.

The amendment, introduced to the Regulation on the Removal and Disposal of Traded Goods and Possessions, was officially enacted on Sunday.

According to the new regulation, importers of animals brought into the country illegally are now responsible for handling all aspects of the removal and repatriation process, including all necessary documentation and associated costs. 

If the state decides to repatriate illegally imported animals to their country of origin or transfer them to a rescue centre or another appropriate facility, the importer is required to make all necessary arrangements.

This includes securing the proper documentation, organising transportation, and covering any related expenses. The regulation sets a strict deadline, stating that these arrangements must be completed within seven days of the animals being taken into state custody.

In cases where the state determines that the animals should be euthanised or otherwise destroyed, the importer will be responsible for covering the cost of this process as well.

The Maldives continues to face sporadic incidents of illegal imports of animals and birds, despite national and international laws designed to protect endangered species and prevent illegal trade. Until now, the government has borne the financial burden of disposing of these animals, but the new amendment shifts this responsibility directly to those breaking the law.

Comments

profile-image-placeholder