Advertisement
The winning monument designs by Team Arkos.

HDC probes AI use in monument design competition

A total of seven entries were submitted, with the top prize awarded to Team Arkos, led by Abdullah Shaiman Waheedh and Ibrahim Ifaz.

2 hours ago

The Housing Development Corporation (HDC) has launched an inquiry into the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in its recently concluded monument design competition.

The competition, which was announced in late September, invited creative submissions from various designers to showcase innovative ideas for a public monument.

A total of seven entries were submitted, with the top prize awarded to Team Arcos, led by Abdulla Shaiman Waheed and Ibrahim Ifaz. The winning design was selected by a panel of judges comprising designated professionals appointed by HDC.

The competition's win, which received a prize of MVR 100,000, has drawn criticism from the public. Many have alleged that the design was heavily influenced by AI tools, raising questions about the fairness and originality of the submission process.

In a statement released on Monday, HDC acknowledged these concerns and confirmed that they are investigating the authenticity of the designs submitted. The corporation noted that some participants and members of the public have formally complained, alleging that certain designs were AI-generated rather than original works by the artists.

HDC emphasized its commitment to ensuring transparency and fairness in such competitions. The statement reaffirmed the company’s dedication to providing a platform for Maldivian artists, stating that all participants should have equal opportunities without being overshadowed by technological advancements like AI.

“The target is to make all the works there transparent,” the statement added, highlighting the importance of clarity and fairness in the evaluation process.

As AI tools become increasingly accessible and capable, their role in creative processes continues to spark debate worldwide. While AI can assist artists in enhancing their work, it also raises ethical questions about authorship and originality, particularly in competitions where manual creativity is highly valued.

Comments

profile-image-placeholder